“The way you become divine is to become wholly human”

In the shadow of the foreign cousin—

John Shelby “Jack” Spong is a retired American bishop of the Episcopal Church. From 1979 to 2000 he was Bishop of Newark. He is a liberal Christian theologian, religion commentator and author. He calls for a fundamental rethinking of Christian belief away from theism and traditional doctrines. He said, I quote: God is not a Christian, God is not a Jew, or a Muslim, or a Hindu, or a Buddhist. All of those are human systems which human beings have created to try to help us walk into the mystery of God. I honor my tradition, I walk through my tradition, but I don’t think my tradition defines God, I think it only points me to God…I think that anything that begins to give people a sense of their own worth and dignity is God…Christianity is not about the divine becoming human so much as it is about the human becoming divine…I believe that is what the God experience does for us. It calls us beyond our limits into the fullness of life – into a capacity to love people we are not taught to love – and into an ability to be who we are…Christianity is, I believe, about expanded life, heightened consciousness and achieving a new humanity. It is not about closed minds, supernatural interventions, a fallen creation, guilt, original sin or divine rescue…The Bible tells me that every life is holy; the Bible tells me that every life is loved; the Bible tells me that every life is called to be all that it can be…In the first gospel, Mark, the risen Christ appears physically to no one, but by the time we come to the last gospel, John, Thomas is invited to feel the nail prints in Christ’s hands and feet and the spear wound in his side…Perhaps the most telling witness against the claim of accurate history for the Bible comes when we read the earliest narrative of the crucifixion found in Mark’s gospel and discover that it is not based on eyewitness testimony at all…In the first gospel, Mark, the risen Christ appears physically to no one, but by the time we come to the last gospel, John, Thomas is invited to feel the nail prints in Christ’s hands and feet and the spear wound in his side. There is no way that the Fourth Gospel was written by John Zebedee or by any of the disciples of Jesus. The author of this book is not a single individual, but is at least three different writers/editors, who did their layered work over a period of 25 to 30…This point must be heard: the Gospels are first-century narrations based on first-century interpretations. Therefore they are a first-century filtering of the experience of Jesus. They have never been other than that. We must read them today not to discover the literal truth about Jesus, but rather to be led into the Jesus experience they were seeking to convey…The church is like a swimming pool. Most of the noise comes from the shallow end. What the mind cannot accept, the heart can finally never adore. Whatever it was that people experience in Jesus has today come to be identified with medieval doctrines based on premodern…theology. I have become convinced that we must put an end to atonement theology or there will be no future for the Christian faith.(I recall that at the time of Lent, the reader will forgive Atonement theology assumes that we were created in some kind of original perfection. We now know that life has emerged from a single cell that evolved into self-conscious complexity over billions of years. There was no original perfection. If there was no original perfection, then there could never have been a fall from perfection. If there was no fall, then there is no such thing as “original sin” and thus no need for the waters of baptism to wash our sins away. If there was no fall into sin, then there is also no need to be rescued. How can one be rescued from a fall that never happened? How can one be restored to a status of perfection that he or she never possessed? So most of our Christology today is bankrupt. Many popular titles that we have applied to Jesus, such as “savior,” “redeemer,” and “rescuer,” no longer make sense, because they assume”. Unless biblical literalism is challenged overtly in the Christian church itself, it will, in my opinion, kill the Christian faith. It is not just a benign nuisance that afflicts Christianity at its edges; it is a mentality that renders the Christian faith unbelievable to an increasing number of the citizens of our world. The Christian story did not drop from heaven fully written. It grew and developed year by year over a period of forty-two to seventy years. That is not what most Christians have been taught to think, but it is factual. Christianity has always been an evolving story. It was never, even in the New Testament, a finished story…Atonement theology is not the pathway to life. The ability to give ourselves away to others in love is. It is not the winners who achieve life’s meaning; it is the givers. That is the basis upon which a new Christianity can be built for a new world. Atonement theology was born in Gentile ignorance of Jewish worship traditions. John (from the Gospel, author of the essay emphasizes) sees Jesus symbolically as the serpent lifted up on his cross, drawing the venom out of human life, restoring wholeness. It is a powerful image. The task of religion is not to turn us into proper believers; it is to deepen the personal within us, to embrace the power of life, to expand our consciousness, in order that we might see things that eyes do not normally see. Let me say (Archbishop said) that I consider myself a deep believer in the reality of God. I might define God quite differently from the way some people in the Christian faith would do so, but I do not doubt the reality of that experience. When I grew up in the South (the Archbishop said) I was taught that segregation was the will of God, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that women were by nature in inferior to men, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. I was taught that it was okay to hate other religions, and especially the Jews, and the Bible was quoted to prove it. In the story of Jesus I found … a center for my being. Behind the supernatural framework of the first century, behind the language of myth, magic, and superstition, I discovered a life I wanted to know; a life that possessed a power I wanted to possess; a freedom, a wholeness for which I had yearned for years. All religion seems to need to prove that it’s the only truth. True religion is not about possessing the truth. No religion does that. It is rather an invitation into a journey that leads one toward the mystery of God. Idolatry is religion pretending that it has all the answers. Christianity is, I believe, about expanded life, heightened consciousness and achieving a new humanity. It is not about closed minds, supernatural interventions, a fallen creation, guilt, original sin or divine rescue. Above all, words must be recognized as symbolic pointers to truth, not objective containers of truth. Integrity and honesty, not objectivity and certainty, are the highest virtues to which the theological enterprise can aspire. From this perspective, all human claims to possess objectivity, certainty, or infallibility are revealed as nothing but the weak and pitiable pleas of frantically insecure people who seek to live in an illusion because reality has proved to be too difficult. If the resurrection of Jesus cannot be believed except by assenting to the fantastic descriptions included in the Gospels, then Christianity is doomed. For that view of resurrection is not believable, and if that is all there is, then Christianity, which depends upon the truth and authenticity of Jesus’ resurrection, also is not believable.(end of quotes) The Pope Describes the Ancient Traditional Jesus; Bishop Spong Brings Us a Jesus Modern People Can Be Inspired By. In the shadow of alienation and foreign we are. Note, however, new objections: no longer do we agree with the harmony of destiny, fate…Personally, I will say here: I am not a church-controlled businesses. The people do love now without me, I think. God has no religion. I came that you may have life in abundance, Jesus stated. No morality, no even love, but love-life! You have to love to be around! It’s not about the behavior of the name of Christians, but for the healing of our religious wounds. In Christ, heaven touched earth. Does the Church survives magical thinking and suspicious religious beliefs? Unfortunately, during my priesthood, I have met directors who don’t have much to say. It’s the Achilles heel of the Polish Curia. . I see to be a man who doesn’t wait for things but rather reaches for them. So, what I want to reach for? Perhaps I would like to be an actor, a pope. First and foremost, actors should think. Sometimes argue. Have their own vision of a given character and limited trust towards the director. And work, and not wait for the director to solve all their acting problems. I am aware that I do some decent work on stage chiefly because I’m really hardworking person. But answering your question: yes, I know why I’m on stage, forgive the reader say I this- close to altar, and it’s because I have a great respect to the viewer. I told myself even one day, I would not celebrate Mass, because I have respect for the them. I would blush for shame if I went on stage and performed something unrehearsed. Coming back to directors- it’s important for them to be open, not to push some matters and, first and foremost, help actors in their work. A director should be a little bit of a psychotherapiest. On the big scene of the National Theatre in Warsaw, the actors played a role that is iconic for literature and Polish drama, namely that of Gustaw-Konrad. I like the character they created very much. At some points, they move on a thin red line, but they never cross it. They don’t give your audience any clear, messianic answers. This role is legendary. In my situation maybe it would be Gustav-Leszek, a new character to describe. Polish performances of “Dziady” nearly always were accompanied by some smaller or bigger historical riots… I can be critical towards myself. I’ve acquired this skill with time. Priest. Are you grateful for this role? Yes, and I know that I worked very hard for it. But I also don’t rule out that others deserved this role too. I would play for a half an hour, even more and more, and then the security would drag me off the stage… Now few vocations to the priesthood, I do not know why. An actor is bound by something at all times… May be I’ll write something. I would like to describe the world with my own words, in my own way… I’m not going to preach heresies, my essay let it be a voice in the discussion only. I just feel the need to arrange words in my own order just for once…Today, I would play the role on stage only one new character, namely Gustav-African father. The latter remains in the shadow of a foreign, that is a foreign faith, foreign Bible, the foreign community in the beginning of the third millennium. Black has a face that one’s of our colleague from Africa, he still speaks the words of a foreign language. Now the man is still black, I think. In this context, I would say: you have to change our faith in order to become the new Christian. (Fin)

Leave a comment