against a small era in defense of a miracle

The Most Reverend Mr. President of the Republic of Poland

Mr.  Bronisław Komorowski, Warsaw

I want to use in my letter- the request words by John Steinbeck and Salman Rushdi. I quote: “Our lives are not what we deserve; they are, let us agree, in many ways deficient. Our lives teach us who we are.  If I were a Muslim, I’d be dead by now. Sometimes legends make reality, and become more useful than the facts.” Salman Rushdi said: “What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.” In this world without quiet corners, there can be no easy escapes from history, from hullabaloo, from terrible, unquiet fuss. John Steinbeck have told: “A poet’s work is to name the unnameable, to point at frauds, to take sides, start arguments, shape the world, and stop it going to sleep… Books choose their authors; the act of creation is not entirely a rational and conscious one… Doubt, it seems to me, is the central condition of a human being in the twentieth century… In my heart there may be doubt that I deserve the Nobel award over other men of letters whom I hold in respect and reverence – but there is no question of my pleasure and pride in having it for myself… Literature was not promulgated by a pale and emasculated critical priesthood singing their litanies in empty churches – nor is it a game for the cloistered elect, the tinhorn mendicants of low calorie despair.  Literature is as old as speech. It grew out of human need for it, and it has not changed except to become more needed. The skalds, the bards, the writers are not separate and exclusive. From the beginning, their functions, their duties, their responsibilities have been decreed by our species. Humanity has been passing through a gray and desolate time of confusion. His great predecessor, as a laureate of the Nobel prize, William Faulkner, referred to it as a tragedy of universal fear so long sustained that there were no longer problems of the spirit, so that only the human heart in conflict with itself seemed worth writing about. Faulkner, more than most men, was aware of human strength as well as of human weakness. Furthermore, the writer is delegated to declare and to celebrate man’s proven capacity for greatness of heart and spirit – for gallantry in defeat – for courage, compassion and love. In the endless war against weakness and despair, these are the bright rally-flags of hope and of emulation. I hold that a writer who does not passionately believe in the perfectibility of man, has no dedication nor any membership in literature… The present universal fear has been the result of a forward surge in our knowledge and manipulation of certain dangerous factors in the physical world… With humanity’s long proud history of standing firm against natural enemies, sometimes in the face of almost certain defeat and extinction, we would be cowardly and stupid to leave the field on the eve of our greatest potential victory… Understandably, I have been reading the life of Alfred Nobel – a solitary man, the books say, a thoughtful man. He perfected the release of explosive forces, capable of creative good or of destructive evil, but lacking choice, ungoverned by conscience or judgment. Less than fifty years after his death, the door of nature was unlocked and we were offered the dreadful burden of choice. Less than fifty years after his death, the door of nature was unlocked and we were offered the dreadful burden of choice. ” We have usurped many of the powers we once ascribed to God/…/ I used to say, ‘There is a God-shaped hole in me.’ For a long time I stressed the absence, the hole. Now I find it is the shape which has become more important/…/ The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas – uncertainty, progress, change – into crimes. The acceptance that all that is solid has melted into the air, that reality and morality are not givens but imperfect human constructs, is the point from which fiction begins. (Though) If I were asked for a one-sentence sound bite on religion, I would say I was against it,” Salman Rushdi  also said. This my book of today: I just but have to shut it. Because most of what matters in my life takes place in absence of mine. One of the extraordinary things about human events is that the unthinkable becomes thinkable. Before I reconcile to the human being, I have to reconcile one with the neighbor. We have usurped many of the powers we once ascribed to God. “What one writer can make in the solitude of one room is something no power can easily destroy,” S. Rushdi said. The danger and the glory and the choice rest finally in man. The test of his perfectibility is at hand. Having taken Godlike power, we must seek in ourselves for the responsibility and the wisdom we once prayed some deity might have. Man himself has become our greatest hazard and our only hope. So that today, St. John the apostle may well be paraphrased: In the end is the Word, and the Word is Man – and the Word is with Men. For this reason the life of today is brutal, I would like to be faithful in my vocation Christ mission to the end. That’s why I write this letter at that moment of our history to you. Please the Reverend Mr. President in the last day of January 2012 year to occur, exit of the appeal in television with “time for life”, I’d like nothing more. I would be a very grateful. Sincerely priest Stanislaw Barszczak

PS. As I believe this letter was read by President of the Republic of Poland

Leave a comment