The only memory

Stanislaw Barszczak—-The only memory—-
There is still a lot of truths inaccessible ordinary people. Even in the most recent codes of human rights is not fully express the truth about man and his freedom. From the eighteenth century man as a “reservoir of ideas” is fulfilled, not even for real data especially, the person as an individual, it will be a reservoir for the future of human freedom. But let’s stop only on the issues of fear and memories of our childhood. Fear, however only the content and effect of your thoughts-in fact they are scared. Little boy paralyzed by fear of “black people”, which lies under the bed and take him right away. But it is enough to lit the light and the father of the child explained that the danger exists only in his imagination, and fear vanishes. But he would not have been higher if scary “black people” really existed. But boy triggers a truth: what you fear does not exist. Most human fear is unfounded, it’s just the shadows cast by a sick mind. S. Freud at work, “Psychopathology of everyday life” (1901) have relied on his earlier trial, which might demonstrate the tendentious nature of our reminder. Well, many people in the earliest childhood memories are preserved in the memory of the facts is often indifferent and child, while important, full of meaning and affective experience of that time did not leave the memory of most adults no trace. It is well known that our memory would deprive choose between the experiences. But we should also know the child mental choices are similar rules, which we at the age of intellectual maturity. What’s more neutral memories of childhood owe their existence to the process of displacement, as Freud writes, “they replace in the reproduction of other truly important (and forgotten) the feeling of” I, Freud writes: “Because they are not preserved due to its own content, but through the associated union of that content with another, muffled, content, therefore, is justified given them by me the name “memories masking” (Deckerrinerungen). Some scientists refer to our memories of the sixth month of life. It seems that no matter that we treat children’s amnesia, forgetting to survive the first years of life. Freud writes: “We forget, for which the high efficiency of intellectual and emotional as the complex emotions the child is capable of four years, and we should rather wonder that the memory of the subsequent years are so few of them are generally preserved-especially since we have some data to assume that forgotten children themselves experience in the development of an individual not gone without a trace, but it had a decisive influence on his later life. “By the way, say, too, that Freud’s view, the children also causes amnesia neurotic symptoms. Well, we did not know the conditions of this to remind yourself to survive. Children’s memories preserved once we seem to be easy, it is again difficult to understand, and even surprising. Some of the paintings are like fake memoirs, incomplete, or shifted in time and space. Blamed for these mistakes usual fickleness of memory. But powerful forces of the later period of life also affect the ability of remembering childhood experiences. The best way to remind yourself of these memories would be, as already said Freud, dreams-“dream they all predominantly in visual images.” A Visual learners, for example, adults do not see myself in the memories already from past years. Usually each of us has a guardian angel prayer, which ended more than once daily, our children’s prayers. Angels are invisible spirits that have been with us from earliest childhood. But I want to demonstrate here with Freud, that the so-called. earliest memories of life there is no authentic memory trace, but only have the later development, which reflected the influences of later years, a variety of psychic forces. Memories of children receive thus masking the importance of memories, but also present an interesting analogy to the myth, childhood memories of nations. Freud cited a few examples of masking memories. Male strongly inhibited in their love life has kept a picture of his fifth year of life. He sits in a chair in the garden with my aunt, who teaches him the letters. The difference between the mines makes it difficult, so ask her aunt said to him, after which they distinguish. My aunt points out that the ‘m’ has a whole piece, ie, the third line, more than ‘n’. On the other hand as if he wanted to know the difference between minutes, so then tried to get to know the difference between a boy and a girl. He found that the difference is the same, that the boy is also just about the entire piece more than a girl, and while this knowledge aroused in him the memory of that child’s curiosity. Already early childhood reflects the rights and duties of a complete human being. You do not need to help your child “by force” by way of the fullness of life. And provide him with only basic survival sanitaria, to be with him “in his home.” As regards the so-called. memories of “masking”, they are manifested in one form or another in later life as a man. I’m taking voice here as a priest, or a biography of the only witness to our lives. I want to paraphrase out another example of Freud. When I started in adult life to pay attention to the remnants of memories from my own childhood, came to my mind a scene which I could refer to the completed age of eight. I see myself, as I stand before the three-piece mirror (a friend can become before the cabinet) and look at the inherent beauty of the body. I was prepared for anything, but this scene was not interrupted by anyone. Brought the analysis led me to a completely unexpected perspective of that image. I missed my mother, like today, I think, I suspected that it is somehow “open” in the winged mirror. I remember from my early childhood, a different picture knocker to my apartment once a boy. I’m older than a friend, but I remember him visiting me in early childhood, and when I was thirteen years I ended up staying with him. Justifies the scene today, a mother’s living presence in my life that she had been separated me maternal love from the infinite power of his father, who her with me left to its fate. I also remember a different picture, the sudden invasion of mom and her friends to the apartment after returning from a retreat at a nearby church, I tucked under the quilt, casement windows open wide. I could fall from six feet out the window and kill himself. Today I call a new justification for this, in turn, scenes, memories of earliest childhood. The disappearance of the mother of my life, any further departure after her death in 2005. At all costs do not ever want to let that happen. When my mother will soon run out, I have much suspected, that time he made a bad mistake, that she moved to a happy eternity, but for me. I also want to say that I never stopped to pray with his mother, talking with her, as I said, prayers and prayers to the guardian angel. I must just say that something was terribly ambitious and always wanted to go forward. I chose teaching, the priesthood, writing, but never of course you have not stopped dreaming. I chose the priesthood, then indeed very consciously, because I thought that I could have almost the best opportunity of my life. In school, no object was not my forte, not from lack of talent, but because I am a student in High School I did not take certain items so crazy, but I liked to go back to them every time. Moreover, I learned from different textbooks, which are then used to read without thinking. When I went to the theology of my aunt once asked me: “if these studies are actually appropriate for me?” I have to say clearly: I have a broken son. My aunt said: “Dear child, if you truly were considering that, so do this! Because you have to live with it, as you are studying. I would not rewrite anything here.”Thus was created in me a great motivation to study is successfully completed. And then the trail began to climb. Grew up in a family, it has always been a symbol of the mother, in a family where the child remained in the relationship over the full expression of love. My dad, so then it was terrible, he was an adjunct-professor at the University where I was born. I was born in the year to bring the Berlin wall, the first human flight in space. The first three years of my life-it was always the time of separation from the mother when I was in an orphanage. And so, especially in these times of scarcity, however, was always next to my mother, would come from the briefcase of fresh provisions, then I never felt hungry. My mother was always with me, supported me, then through the long forty years of life. Even after 1995, in the thirties of my life, as I wrote about it once when I lived in our home again ‘the mother’. Then also in the house nothing was missing, her mother always brought fresh bread and butter. Also in the garden was getting incredibly much coal were dumped into the cell, was building a garage floors, I plant trees and shrubs, had sore, and I laid the apples. We were together, her mother was always warmly received, celebrated Mass with her in my chapel. We were close together. This great confidence, which then in those early years as a child, then as a priest I received, this trust is a trust in the world, I never really left-to this day. Then I went for the first time abroad. Austria was the first step to foreign countries. But home, um, the home of bears in his heart, this feeling does not pass at all. My real home is in other words still in Silesia at Tarnowskie Góry. My second home is probably France. America fell in love and I learned to judge a country of great opportunities, unlimited possibilities. This is a fantastic country, with all its hardships and adversity. In other words, the U.S. has always been very vigorous, vital democracy. This is naturally a country-oriented Christianity. In fact, it is part of the West. I told you earlier that I started working in the church, because I am convinced that we live in a world mentally oriented. And yet I was good at languages, philosophy, humanities. The key to my success, as is shown by some, were primarily social gaffes. Today I’m very pleased. I already had the joy of daily contacts with a group of friends. It’d be beautiful. Some of us may have had and rocky road. But man does not cease to learn. The priesthood must complete personality show though. You cannot play any role and do warn, though this was. No, it has to be authentic. Once out of the question the risk that they actually show, it never is the contact in this way, with creativity as such, and which must necessarily be found, if you want to have success. We went through so many battles, the difficulties in this area are smaller, we are becoming more operationally in relations with our neighbors. Moreover, do not presume that the world itself comes to a consensus. No, it happens often strongly held disputes. In my opinion, complete democracy should be based on common agreement, often coarse debate. This should include not predictable compromises. Therefore, the person should have been more critical, then I have to say today, on my own, the next steps in the spiritual space of the third millennium of Christianity. Before me, after all spiritual roads were initiated. I went with the current generation of several periods of development of modern Christian society. It was a wild time at which valued only the order of daily duties, I dabbled with them strongly. Then I learned a lot of senseless things. In any case, in the daily discussions finally learned a lot crazy. I started to open up the space until recently, unknown to me. Or another owned a mad time of suspicion and distrust on my priestly identity, where “my place of residence” remained somehow invisibly shaken. But the friend was born here, I was very fortunate for me to be there that I found him there. Now the internal wounds heal, we have many times with a friend House on one wavelength and we could actually have some business to discuss each other. I do not believe the crisis is of course the responsibilities which the government must take, and taking into account the mass media. Cultural impulses are initiatives in other words initiatives of individuals. World became so complicated that we need transparency, free mass media. Always been interested in politics, otherwise would stay away from home, my residence. But I put in my life for personal effort, luck, work. We are delighted with the silhouette of St. Francis of Assisi. On one day, dismounted and shared with the poor all that he had. And before his own father, a wealthy merchant, is completely exposed, thereby confirming that already belongs to another world. You could say that Francis is fully exposed before the people. Cross of Christ, he is not so much for profit as a loss. We have everything to lose for Christ. Thus, experience “mystical night”, is to learn to “lose” in life. This is a new identity, and now Francis has no clothes, but slow. We have to drop down to nakedness (sin spogliarsi alla nudita). Because if I did not have that carnal knowledge of a church, if I had got no heritage of my life before I was born, who’d be? Heritage, which may be implemented by the “complete taste” of modest church-life that it had surrounded me in early childhood, not only by the child’s memory, extremely precise due to all the feelings, smells, tastes, impressions of rest or some empty experience, feeling of continuance . I write this, I understand it now. In turn, all progress Francis about his relationship with the church, consisted of heroic obedience to this “organization”, just totally. Who am I before God, we take these new criteria for the Christian with God, waiting for God’s mercy, his grace, not so much to collect contributions, which make the sacrifice of life for others. Human nature it can be opened to the last truth of life. Then it may be revealed on our own something as in the life of St. Francis, the brotherhood of all of us, so we may finally choose the sky irrevocably, the only space, the last liberty.

Leave a comment