Odpowiedzialność cz.2

Now a thinker says: I am respectable. If I with you am responsible not only for your corporeal well-being, but also for the orientation and quality of your entire life, this presupposes in me the necessary conditions for such a huge task: benevolence, freedom of action, some wisdom about human destiny, a certain degree of prudence, acquaintance with a good tradition, and so on. But to accept responsibility for your life would be irresponsible if I cannot bear responsibility for myself. But how, through which experiences, do I discover my responsibility for my own life? How do I awaken to the respectability of my own, non-chosen but amazing and amazingly worthy existence? How do I become aware of the «height» of that in me, which orders me «to take good care of myself»? To follow my conscience presupposes that I discover what calls me through it. The substantial or «hypostatic» core of my life precedes my acceptance of the responsibility to which my given self trusts the unfolding of my possibilities. The conscientious realization of my own self is a service that I desire to perform in order to honor the conscience that targets me. On the elementary level of life, my happiness is confirmed and unfolded by an enjoyable transformation of the earth into my home, but the deepest, originary interest or Desire in me is the most disinterested, unselfish, and un-egoistic of all interests. Thinker said: if we are not motivated by this «Desire of the Absolute,» neither my own, nor any other self could inspire any interest in the Good beyond being. Then I think being the result of any kind of cognition, the self’s responsibility to the other who faces is immediate, originary, and irreducible.
Now, You looked at me, his(your) face pained. “Let’s wait outside,” I said. And luck was with us. Probably yet not an interesting life but only the tribulation is gaining on the cosmos. For this reason at last time it would be a great tribulation close to us. We need to invest new forum of collaboration behind a market and bureaucracy also. It is very important to use the sanctions for the irresolute people now It is a need of the reason now, of the political and economical actions for them, an using of your era of power. Once more the process of a responsibility for a power of a state and the church in a new millennium has begun. The church is on the boat of Peter always. But I am never able to see the other as she or he really is. The third impel you to think. So, it is necessary, one should, one ought to fight for every inch of Self’s land, in my self-imposed exile for this a just cause. I’m only responsible for my own attitude; and I have a duty to other people not to lay a downer on them. That’s my own choice, I picked that duty up, nobody laid it on me, I chose it for myself–that is that I don’t want to lay something on somebody else. We have a choice to pick out “duties.” But I’m “responsible” for me. You can’t drink a glass of water for me. You can’t eat a sandwich for me. You could cook a beautiful steak and put it in front of me, but you can’t eat it for me, is that correct? And you can’t go to the bathroom for me. So I’m “responsible” for all that. I’m responsible for how I feel. You can’t think for me. You can’t act for me–you can’t do any of those things. Now, we pick up duties for other people. That’s a free choice. I did it or I did not. I can also lay the “duties” down. Again, it’s a free choice, ok? And I don’t choose to keep some “duty” for eternity, that’s my own choice. And I was responsible for accepting the duty, nobody laid it on me. I did that on my own. “Duty” and “responsibility” are two different things. Duty is what you would have for whoever you want to do it, your mother, your friends, or both, a job, Life whatever you wanted to. But you can pick it up and lay it down. Responsible is what you are for yourself whether you like it or not. There is an ethics in which responsibility is seen to precede freedom has been based on an exercise of any violence. A tribulation of the world may be overcome by a dressing of my own’s wound. So, I am called by your face and you are called by mine, I suppose by our lit up and young eyes more and more. I am concerned about my own destiny because I experience it from within as an awesomely lovable burden, whereas I experience your destiny as the call that liberates me from being imprisoned in endless self-reflection. My caring for you also takes care of my own true self because it promotes me as if I were another Other. For this reason I must honor and love the Self in me as much as You, because You and I meet in the trace of the Good, which has made us responsible keepers of one anOther.(R.Peperzak)
The other is the same as self …So, like masters of the height (or depth), speaking in his uniqueness. The other man in this relationship is beyond any knowledge He remains absolutely in its otherness The other has to bear as an equal among equals The thinkers described the ontological determination of this I They also described that on the interpersonal level as a “way from the others to myself.” “How the Other is also the face and appearance, the defendant and self.
So, a thinker says, that is the identity of the subject not reflexive, but a ethical, since the subject is chosen by others in his uniqueness … A thinker tries to take this opportunity to justify a recourse to Plato’s descriptions of the good to appear the primacy of the ethical. One possibility here is also the way in terms of thinker’s wonder about the passive choice of the self through the calling of arrival through the face of the Other Now we understand better thinker’s the questions: “Why are there beings rather than nothing?” “We must remain in ethics, even if it disappointed and even if it promises nothing. And we have to a faith without a happy ending. Even if you’ve seen the end in Auschwitz, the death of ethics, that is no reason, ethics regarded as dead. I still believe in ethics. The crisis of ethics is no reason not to conduct yourself in accordance with ethical.
A thinker writes: What we are talking about, namely education, civilization, culture, scientific and aesthetic there is a garment spirit of the nation. Why its so different colors we see in this or that time, the other in the east, the other in the north, the west and the south? Naturally, since each people, strange in the old ages, another had a different imagination and poetic inspiration, even the memory of another past time, another reason in philosophy, at the end of another method, or procedures to improve the science and skills. Famous thinker says: “Every spirit of Corinthian’s ore is exposed of the ruins. In fact, only ruins are! Otherwise I cannot understand the man and his history. Primary, never enough no greater depth, the human mind split burst. There is scampered it so that now no way, no effort the agreement and unity with itself, in itself, can not come. In his own heart, we have a great tribulation and storm, in the spirit wear upset. Does this effect is not expressed in the civilization of all peoples? Know yourself is to have the ground beneath himself, and shot inside. (M. Mochnacki)
Then “the people have always lived on hope alone.” So, “not quite here, but yet at hand” A thinker said: The Lord did not created religion, but the world. Then since it is suffering, God by all possible means writes itself. The bible says: At the end of the world would be the great tribulation. Now for that reason we may ask: what is suffering? The most fundamental in me is coming uppermost, and the transient, the sensational, is dispersing. For it can’t adversely influence what is essential to me. That’s why my work is now more powerful and less arbitrary, as if seen by another person, and illuminated from outside. In the midst of the confusions of nature one person trusting eternally in another, and making himself and the other secure through faith. All that’s left now is purely poetic work, putting more life into individual places, as I’ve made so sure of the fundamental mood and dimension of expression that it won’t leave me groping around in uncertainty any more. So I used to be too subjective, and I was always tempted to find my inner self in the exterior and dissipate my imagination on other people and on life.
The great theologian said in an interview: I estimate that what convincingly in Jesus inside were overcome, what occurred, survived was that he was imposing God’s will the specific direction in understanding the intention, in the mood, a sense of meaning, the sense of (full) pleasure (and inclinations), at such and such way of thinking , in this sense that the will of God is truly holy man, and (that) the man also important is as injunctions, but it remains true, and that the Sabbath, for example, is the human will, and that it is more important-that it depends more on the more-which includes a single man does, as that what believes. Goes also to all the many (powerful) things that we know of Jesus, which we learned from him, which we initiated, we remember. We are able to do it, for which we are grateful to him. But in principle this was the so-called, that it is not the knowledge, skills, which leaves us that with us end, peel, and relaxes. Not We should keep it very well in practice: and also by the leadership of the Church should finally once in this way (it) be done. As for the statue of Jesus, it should also be every man for her himself a little care, it should disturb him. I do not want this in a few seconds further developed. To an actual, detailed explanation is not to say we have this conversation almost no pop-up time, time present and so there was no time. Theologian continued in the same interview: I is (something) recognized as legitimate, and it will do. But now trying to convince people. These are the things for which intercede, which I designate as , describe because of the ‘global ethos’ (Weltethos) Here the problem arises because the question of sentence, opinions, otherwise (very different) sound, etc. For this ( to investigate these cases) is required not only political will but also an ethical will, to be able to talk about it. I am of the opinion that it is-what-I said here a very, very basic need some confidence. Well, precisely because (a) all there is deep respect, esteem (Ehrfurcht) with respect to life, you see not kill, “you should not kill. (H. Küng)
This paper, there is the outcome of several years research supported by a tedious, tiring exhausting work. So, we have this idea that we are supposed to be responsible and have responsibility within us. But what if this is not responsibility at all. I’m not saying I would choose “hate or indifference or negativity” over “Responsibility” or compassion or positivity. – But I question myself if I really know what responsible is. So far I’ve been taught that responsibility is when someone does something for you or gives you something or vise versa. and When you don’t give them what they want or don’t give…then Responsibility is questioned. For me the responsibility is as while on the way of Love. I chose the responsibility. And what’s more I’m serious connate with the ethical now. For I’m not in power I’ve begun to hold in great respect a individual contribute, state’s contribute also to happiness of mankind and glory of a Lord God. I’m of the opinion that there is carring of today. Namely a calling to be in own profession. For exemple the people want to be representative themselves on the television and have satisfaction. So I never cite other philosophers as yours.
I bear for the person before me an infinite responsibility which is regularly betrayed for the sake of justice in responsibility for other people, too. The deeper question is how the court can be founded on this betrayal, and how institutions in general can work for the sake of justice through the use of violence. Looked at in this light, these ideals are not merely renewed, but also radically deepened. Instead of being a declaration of individual freedom, they must now be read as a recognition of responsibility for every other human, a responsibility limited only by the finite nature of one’s individual assets. In this paper, the author argues that the metaphysical ground revealed by Lévinas’ work provides the basis intended by the founding fathers for their stated ideals, and also provides a way to approach the practical restoration and renewal of those ideals…
According to Lévinas, our encounter with the other immediately commands responsibility, a responsibility which emerges out of the transcendence of the other. This suggests a re-thinking of conventional notions of sovereignty also. On the one hand without an account of the problem of subjectivity, it is impossible to construct any adequate and satisfactory theory of consciousness. On the other hand Although the thinker of contemporary argues that justice must be globalized, she rejects a world state because such a state would require the use of military force or coercion. The thinker argues for the superiority of her capabilities approach against the social contract tradition. The strength of her capabilities approach, lies in her rejection of the Kantian and Rawlsian conception of the person as a rational being. The capabilities approach, by contrast, sees rationality and animality as thoroughly unified.(M.Nussbaum)

There is life of yours. A poet says: You dropped your whispers: We are never going to die, you fool! T he essence of our soul most pure will speak to you. No more the flesh but still providing ecstasy. We bards forever never do depart. But why’s your picture withered now? Why does your face look pale and grey? There’s sorrow in your tone. And slowly, oh so slowly all your words will fade. “We grieve about our art. It’s nothing but a shadow. We’ve touched upon the essence but still we grope the dark. Go on ahead, you brave man! Search further, further still. Lead us down the hall where Stillness rules. That finally our voice may rest. And you may rest upon the Timeless. Voices of time once golden! May Stillness be your arts transcendence. Find out the longing of your youth. Make ignorance look pale. Do not betray the fresh desires of spring. That autumn yield abundant happiness. And fertile be the soil of winter.
cdn

Leave a comment